Those decades did help to close the gap between the labor force participation of men and women. In 1970, men in the United States had a labor force participation rate of 79.7 percent. During the 40-year span, that rate drifted slowly down to 71.2 percent in 2010.
Labor force participation rates by gender in Oregon are quite similar to national rates. In Oregon in 2010, an estimated 60.8 percent of women were in the labor force, compared with 71.0 percent of men.
More women work in education and health services (34%) than in any other industry group (Graph 2). Many women also work in retail trade (10%), and financial activities (10%).
As a share of industry employment, there are only two industries where women are estimated to make up more than half of full-time year-round workers. In education and health services, 70 percent of workers are women. Financial activities employment is 58 percent female.
Construction has the lowest representation of women working full-time year-round, at only 10 percent of the industry's workforce. Natural resources and mining also has a small share of women at 18 percent of the workforce. About one out of every 12 working Oregon women is in manufacturing, and they represent just 26 percent of the industry's workforce.
Median weekly earnings of full-time female workers in the United States were $182 in 1979, compared with $292 for men. This put women's earnings at 62.3 percent of men's earnings. In 2010, women's median weekly earnings were $669, and men's were $824, putting women's earnings at 81 percent of men's earnings. From 1979 to 2010, women's earnings increased 268 percent, while men's earnings increased 182 percent.
Accounting for the education level of female and male workers does not remove the disparity. At all levels of education, women have lower median weekly earnings than men (Graph 3). The earnings gap is largest for workers with advanced degrees. Among advanced degree holders, women's weekly earnings are $1,154 and men's are $1,569, meaning that women's earnings are still only 74 percent of men's for people with such degrees.
Educational attainment is very similar between the genders up through the bachelor degree level; it is only in professional and doctorate degrees that women lag behind, with 2.5 percent of women in Oregon possessing these degrees compared to 4.3 percent of men.
Women's annual earnings as a percent of men's vary significantly by industry. In 2010, women earned more than their male counterparts in only one of Oregon's major industries: mining and logging. In this industry, women's earnings were 104 percent of men's. In all other major industries, women earned less than men. The gap was the smallest in construction, where women's earnings were 96 percent of men's. The earnings gap was largest in educational and health services, where women's average annual earnings were 69 percent of men's. Professional and business services also had a large pay gap between genders, with women earning 70 percent of their male counterparts.
Is this persistent wage gap an example of gender bias? A remnant of the good old boys club? Or is it a matter of economics and personal choice? It is probably a combination of discrimination and personal choice that perpetuates the wage gap. One argument, articulated by Hunter College psychology and linguistics professor Virginia Valian, says that the wage gap is a result of "gender schemas" in the workforce, implicit assumptions about gender differences - held by everyone - that create small differences in characteristics, behaviors, perceptions and evaluations of men and women, causing men to be constantly overrated in their professional lives, and women to be underrated.
Another argument is the glass ceiling; women seem to have more difficulty reaching the top ranks of any industry than do men, evidenced by the still-small ranks of female CEO's at major companies. In early 2012, only 17 Fortune 500 companies had female CEOs, and only 35 Fortune 1000 CEOs were women.
Then there is the argument of choice. Women work part-time more often than men (27% and 13%, respectively). While this doesn't affect median weekly earnings, which included only full-time year-round workers, it could affect the likelihood of promotions and the perceptions of future employers, thus affecting the wages of women who return to work full-time. Women also tend to take more breaks from employment during their careers, more frequently leaving the labor force to care for children and family responsibilities.
The argument has also been made that women are not drawn to the type of work that can come with high-risk premiums, including certain types of construction and protective service occupations. Less than 1 percent of women are in construction occupations and 8 percent of men are in construction, and less than 1 percent of women are in protective service, while 3 percent of men are. Women are more heavily represented in office and administrative support occupations (21% of women and 7% of men), which tend to have lower wages.